Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 463-634-8983

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 463-634-8983

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Child Custody
  4.  | 
  5. Three Requirements for a Caretaker to Obtain Custody of a Child He/She is Rearing

Three Requirements for a Caretaker to Obtain Custody of a Child He/She is Rearing

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Feb 17, 2015 | Child Custody, De Facto Custodian

In the past 40 years, the number us U.S. Children living in a grandparents home and being cared for by grandparents had more than doubled.1 This does number does not include the significant numbers of children being reared by friends and other family. With infants and toddlers, the caretaker may become the child’s primary attachment.

However, parents, even ones who effectively abandon his/her child and come back later, have a fundamental right under the United States Constitution to raise their children and seek their return. Under present Indiana law, a grandparent or third party may obtain custody by taking three steps by the controlling statutes and case law.

First, the caretaker must show bring a suit to establish he or she is a “de facto” custodian under Indiana law, by intervening in a current case with a parent or parents or bringing a law suit against the parent(s).

Second, at the hearing on de facto custody, the third party must show by clear and convincing evidence that he or she has been the primary source of care, nurture, and support for at least six months for a child under three years old or one year for an older child2, which may be continuous or aggregate time.

Third, even if the grandparent or third party does so, he or she must show it is in the child’s best interests that the de facto custodian has custody.3 If this is the case, the natural parents may have parenting time and/or visitation and be required to pay child support.

Nevertheless, if the de facto custodian does not establish that it is in the child’s best interests he or she have custody, the present status of the law does not allow the de facto custodian to have any visitation or parenting time.4 A grandparent, in narrow circumstances, may be entitled to visitation.5

For this reason, in this type of litigation, a de facto custodian may nevertheless lose all contact with the child he or she has raised. These cases are factually and legally complex and presenting the relevant evidence at trial is crucial.

This blog post is written by attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. for general educational purposes. We hope it provides you with a background to help you understand this matter. Dixon & Moseley, P.C. attorneys practice throughout the State.

  • U.S. Census Bureau 2010.
  • Ind.Code § 31-9-2-32.
  • Ind.Code § 31-17-2-8, 8.5 (Dissolution Act).
  • T.H. and C.H. v. R.J. and K.J., ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind.Ct.App. December 18, 2014).
  • Ind.Code § 31-17-5-0.2.
  • Recent Posts

    • Hearsay in Family Court: What Parents Need to Know
    • Intentional vs. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Why Emotional Harm Alone Is Not Enough
    • Can Social Media Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Divorce Case? (2026 Guide)
    • BP Can AI-Generated Content Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Family Law Case?
    • Can a Parent Move Out of State With a Child After Divorce in Indiana?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    463-634-8983

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online