Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 463-634-8983

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 463-634-8983

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Appellate Practice
  4.  | 
  5. Five Considerations For A Court Order You Think Is Incorrect

Five Considerations For A Court Order You Think Is Incorrect

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | May 19, 2015 | Appellate Practice, General Practice, Indiana Court of Appeals, Supreme Court

Indiana’s trial court judges, commissioners, magistrates and protems are dedicated to justice. The unique aspect to their job is they must decide a dispute between two or more people or parties—many other aspects of personal and professional life involves winning to some degree. For this reason, it is sometimes difficult for a party to accept “losing.” And many people just react with the desire to challenge any and every adverse final1 ruling.

However, there at least five considerations or options you have, any or all of which may factor into your decision:

  • Cease litigation.
  • Apply a law and economics approach.
  • Look at the policy in play.
  • Motion to Correct Error.
  • Appeal.
  • A point that is very often lost and never considered is even if you disagree, cease the litigation and put the matter behind you. A neutral and detached judge decided the case; and closure of the matter and moving on in life is sometimes worth accepting you might be wrong. This a prudent decision many times.

    A different angle or lens to view the matter is from a law and economics approach. Will the potential benefits of reversal of a trial court’s order be worth the cost in time and money? If the answer is “no,” that may be the end of the matter. Or if I spend $1.50 or ___to get a judgment for $1.00 ___ is this worth the point in being right?

    In a few cases, litigants are not “fighting” over money but some principle. This is also a valid reason for litigation, and these cases sometimes change the law or world. However, every person must identify the true or core reason they are litigating. If it is to make some point, even with a loss, it may have already been made.

    If there is an actual or perceived error, a litigant can ask the trial court to correct it. This is done by filing a Motion to Correct Error. This lays out the mistake and legally why the trial court should correct it. These are sometimes useful motions to file where there are mathematical errors or scrivener’s errors (like a wrong date).

    Ultimately, if none of these considerations is acceptable, every person with an Indiana case has the right of appeal to a higher court. Typically, this is the Indiana Court of Appeals. A few cases, such as where a trial court declares a statute unconstitutional are taken directly to the Indiana Supreme Court. Is this your case?

    This blog post is written by attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. and is for general educational purposes only. It is not legal advice, or solicitation for legal services. Dixon & Moseley, P.C. attorneys handle civil and criminal appeals from all Indiana state trial courts, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, or United States Supreme Court.

  • Most orders are interlocutory. Only “final” orders may be appealed. Indiana Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.
  • Recent Posts

    • You Think Your Property Is Yours… Until It Isn’t.
    • Hearsay in Family Court: What Parents Need to Know
    • Intentional vs. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Why Emotional Harm Alone Is Not Enough
    • Can Social Media Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Divorce Case? (2026 Guide)
    • BP Can AI-Generated Content Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Family Law Case?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    463-634-8983

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online