Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 463-634-8983

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 463-634-8983

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Divorce
  4.  | 
  5. Three Common Objections You May Hear In Your Trial And What They Generally Mean

Three Common Objections You May Hear In Your Trial And What They Generally Mean

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jun 24, 2015 | Divorce, General Practice

Every judge is skilled, but every trial is dynamic and unique. To ensure a fair process and ruling, the Indiana Supreme Court has adopted Rules of Evidence1 to supplement all of the other bodies of law that apply to a given case. In civil litigation ranging from personal injury to divorce cases, an attorney may make objections to testimony (i.e., a person sworn under oath) or exhibits (i.e., documents).

This blog explores three common objections to testimony and exhibits. With an objection to testimony, a litigant must stop his or her testimony until the trial court rules. If the objection is sustained, the person may not answer. If “overruled,” the litigant may not answer. The most common objection is to “hearsay,” which occurs when a party testifies about what someone else said, other than the other party. Generally, this is impermissible.

The second is akin to the hearsay objection as it relates to documents. Generally, documents, such as medical records, are inadmissible in court unless the person who maintains them (i.e., the record keeper) testifies they are authentic and complete or a written document from the record-keeper is attached. This document authenticates the documents. Without one of these, typically business records of all types are inadmissible. However, trial courts are more flexible with this rule as it relates to domestic cases for a variety of reasons.

The third objection is lodged to testimony that is not relevant and intended to be hurtful or inflict bias in a litigant’s case. This objection is to relevancy. All evidence, both in terms of testimony and documents, must be relevant to a case. If it is not, this objection would be sustained. A classic example in a divorce case is where testimony elicited to establish or bring up an affair. Indiana does not have “fault-based” divorce and this is generally inadmissible testimony.

We hope this blog post helps you understand common objections to documentary and testimonial evidence at trial. If so, it has met it general educational goals. This blog is written by attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. Dixon & Moseley P.C. advocates practice throughout the State of Indiana and handle a variety of cases.

  • The Indiana Rules of Evidence available on-line at the Indiana Supreme Court’s website.
  • Recent Posts

    • Hearsay in Family Court: What Parents Need to Know
    • Intentional vs. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Why Emotional Harm Alone Is Not Enough
    • Can Social Media Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Divorce Case? (2026 Guide)
    • BP Can AI-Generated Content Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Family Law Case?
    • Can a Parent Move Out of State With a Child After Divorce in Indiana?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    463-634-8983

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online