Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 463-634-8983

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 463-634-8983

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Appellate Practice
  4.  | 
  5. “More Appeal”: Three Reasons to Consider Having Your Counsel File a Reply Brief

“More Appeal”: Three Reasons to Consider Having Your Counsel File a Reply Brief

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | May 23, 2017 | Appellate Practice, Indiana Court of Appeals

With each appeal taken to the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Court”), the appellant (bringing the appeal) and appellee have the right to file a brief of about thirty pages with the Court. However, the appellant has the right to have the last say and file one last brief to the appellee’s brief. At a recent, appellate continuing education seminar, attorneys and practitioners had the ability to exchange ideas and tips for making “more appeal” to an appeal. This blog covers three unique points’ that practitioners and/or judges discussed during this event and dinner.

Distillation of the key points. Because original briefs often cover multiple issues and factual issues it may be approximately 30 pages long, a reply brief which is limited to a very short length—and by nature—has to address the most important facts, issues or material.1 Thus, every word counts and many appellate attorneys spend considerable time getting the reply brief precisely right and to the exact word count limit. Remember the power of the written or spoken word—shorter is harder, as Woodrow Wilson said, “If I am to speak for ten minutes, I need a week to prepare; if an hour, I am ready now.” Words matter, particularly final words.

Reading backward. Interestingly, because of the massive amount of electronic data associated with appeals, such as the typed word-for-word record of what witness testified to at trial, exhibits, the appendix (certain motions, papers, and orders) and the brief, some appellate judges read the briefs in reverse order, starting with a reply brief to get a succulent view of what the true legal issues are on appeal. This alone, particularly in legally unique or factually complex cases, likely justifies a reply brief.

Burden of proof. For the appellant or both appellant and appellee where there are cross- appeals, they or it (such as with an entity) has a burden of proof on appeal, as appellate courts defer to trial courts who observed real litigants and can best judge credibility. On appeal, the Court has a cold paper record. For this reason, a reply brief gives the appealing party one more chance to meet his or her burden of proof and get a reversal or other relief from the trial court’s decision by helping establish the appellate burden of proof.

This blog post was written by attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. who handle appeals of all types to the Indiana Court of Appeals, Indiana Supreme Court, Seventh Circuit, and/or United States Supreme Court. This blog post is written for general educational purposes. It is not a solicitation for services or specific legal advice. It is an advertisement.

  • 7,000 words or 15 pages. Indiana Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.
  • Recent Posts

    • Why Is My Child Support Number So Different Than I Expected? (2026 Guide)
    • Can You Appeal a Summary Judgment Order in Indiana? A Guide to Summary Judgment Appeals and De Novo Review (2026)
    • Indiana Civil Appeals: How to Appeal a Civil Judgment in Indiana (2026)
    • Hidden Assets in an Indiana Divorce: What Happens If Your Spouse Is Hiding Money or Property?
    • My Spouse Cheated. Does It Matter in an Indiana Divorce?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    463-634-8983

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online