Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 463-634-8983

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 463-634-8983

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Appellate Practice
  4.  | 
  5. Breaking News: Passenger’s Choice of Words Claiming, “I Didn’t Know” Can Be Used to Convict for Drug Possession!

Breaking News: Passenger’s Choice of Words Claiming, “I Didn’t Know” Can Be Used to Convict for Drug Possession!

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Oct 24, 2018 | Appellate Practice, Criminal Law, Drug Possession, Indiana Court of Appeals

Under Indiana law, you can be convicted of possession of illegal drugs (or other contraband such as a gun) found during the search of a passenger vehicle, even if you are merely the passenger. This concept is called constructive possession and is used to charge and convict both drivers and/or passengers when there is no way for the State to prove direct ownership or control over the drugs or who knew the illegal items were in the car. This is not a new legal concept.

To balance innocence, in cases of constructive possession, the State is required to prove the existence of evidence linking the occupant(s) of the car to the illegal drugs (or other contraband), such as when the drugs are found under the passenger’s seat or in a bag belonging to the passenger. In a key new case–you need to know to protect your constitutional rights–another form of evidence that may be used to convict for possession of drugs found inside a vehicle– the passenger’s own “incriminating statement” connecting the drugs to the passenger. This new case is the subject of this blog post—claiming “I didn’t know” may be an incriminating statement.

In this developing case on constructive possession, the Indiana Courts have affirmed the conviction of a passenger for constructive possession of drugs found in a bag behind the driver’s seat. The passenger’s conviction was based on his simple statement that he didn’t know about the drugs, so he shouldn’t be arrested. The trial court and the Court of Appeals determined and reasoned this to fit the definition of an incriminating statement. The Court’s analysis is that it was a “calculated choice of phrasing that lends itself more to an inference of guilt than an honest denial of ownership”.1

This decision effectively means that you could be arrested for possession of drugs as a passenger in a vehicle, even if you have no ownership or possessory interest in the car or other connection with drugs (or other contraband) depending on what you say. Cases like this demonstrate the importance of your actions and what you say in any traffic stop, whether you are driving or simply riding in a car with someone. Be aware! Knowing the law is the first step to be an engaged citizen. We hope this blog helps.

Dixon & Moseley, P.C. handles criminal cases of all types throughout the state. This blog post is intended for general informational purposes and is not a solicitation for legal services. It is an advertisement.

  • Parks v. State, Case No. 18A-CR-151 (Ind.Ct.App. October 18, 2018).
  • Recent Posts

    • You Think Your Property Is Yours… Until It Isn’t.
    • Hearsay in Family Court: What Parents Need to Know
    • Intentional vs. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress: Why Emotional Harm Alone Is Not Enough
    • Can Social Media Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Divorce Case? (2026 Guide)
    • BP Can AI-Generated Content Be Used as Evidence in an Indiana Family Law Case?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    463-634-8983

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online