Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

Call For A Consultation: 317-350-4108

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 317-350-4108

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Child Custody
  4.  | 
  5. Custody Versus Parenting Time: A Discussion Of Why It May Be Beneficial To Move To Modify Parenting Time Instead Of Custody

Custody Versus Parenting Time: A Discussion Of Why It May Be Beneficial To Move To Modify Parenting Time Instead Of Custody

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | May 23, 2019 | Child Custody, Custody Modification, Family Law, Parenting Time

The family dynamic is something that is always changing, and there is certainly no “standard” or “normal” family. After a divorce or a final determination in a paternity case, often one parent of a child has what is called primary physical custody, and the other parent (the “non-custodial parent”) has what is called parenting time. The terms of the non-custodial parent’s parenting time may take many different shapes, but in general, if the parents cannot agree, courts often look to the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines to make a determination on parenting time. The Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines prescribe several different arrangements depending on the age of the child and other factors, such as the physical distance between the parents’ residences, but in general, for a child five (5) years or older, a non-custodial parent may exercise parenting time on alternating weekends, plus one evening per week, plus one-half of the child’s school summer vacation.1 Sometimes this parenting time may be less and sometimes may be more. Regardless, often non-custodial parents want more time with their children, and such a parent may think that he or she wants to have a court change the custody arrangement so that he or she is now the custodial parent. While there are circumstances where that may be appropriate, this blog explores why it may be a better strategic move to ask for a modification of parenting time rather than a change in primary physical custody.

An important concept: the difference between custody, parenting time, and visitation. The concepts of custody, parenting time, and visitation may often be confused, so as a preliminary matter, it is important to learn what each of these terms actually means on a practical level under Indiana law. Custody over a child has two parts: legal and physical. Legal custody means who makes decisions for a child until the child reaches adulthood with respect to important upbringing issues – primarily religion, education, and medical care. Physical custody refers to where a child lives. Often, when a married couple who are the parents of a child divorce, one parent will receive primary physical custody, and the other will get parenting time which usually includes overnight stays. Consequently, physical custody and parenting time go together – when one parent gets primary custody, the other has parenting time.2 Visitation, contrarily, is simply a time when a non-parent spends time with a child, such as a grandparent awarded Grandparent Visitation.

The statutory requirements for a change in parenting time are different than for a change in custody. Now that we’ve clarified the difference between custody and parenting time, let’s look at what Indiana statutes require for a change of parenting time versus a change in custody. For a change in parenting time, Indiana law provides that:

The court may modify an order granting or denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the best interests of the child.3

Note that the court does not have to extend or decrease parenting time rights based on such a showing, but it may. That’s all one has to do statutorily to have a chance to obtain more parenting time with their children. Now, let’s compare that standard to what is statutorily required for a change in custody. The court can only modify a child custody order if:

[M]odification is in the best interests of the child; and there is a substantial change in one (1) or more of the factors:

  • The age and sex of the child.
  • The wishes of the child’s parents.
  • The wishes of the child, with more consideration given to the child’s wishes if the child is at least fourteen (14) years of age.
  • The interaction and interrelationship of the child with:
  • the child’s parents;
  • the child’s siblings; and
  • any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest.
  • The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community.
  • The mental and physical health of all individuals involved.
  • Evidence of a pattern of domestic or family violence by either parent.
  • Evidence that the child has been cared for by a de facto custodian.4
  • If these conditions are not met, then an Indiana trial court cannot modify custody. Comparing these two statutory requirements, one can see that it is much less difficult to meet the threshold requirements of a change in parenting time than to modify a custody order. While there may be times when seeking modification of custody is appropriate, the option to simply move for a change in parenting time by a non-custodial parent should always factor into the analysis as to how to move forward to reach a desired outcome.

    Additional considerations as to why a modification of parenting time may be more appropriate than a custody modification. In addition to the extra statutory hurdles that one must overcome in seeking a custody modification, practical considerations also show why a parenting time modification may be a more efficient route to help you reach your goals of spending more time with your child(ren). First, a trial court is unlikely to up-end the status quo of a custody arrangement unless there is strong evidence of a change in circumstances and it truly is in the child(ren)’s best interest to have a custody modification. After all, there was probably a reason that the trial court ordered one parent to have primary physical custody in the first place, so a parent moving for a custody modification is going to overcome whatever led the court to rule that way in the first place. Further, a full modification of custody usually involves tangential changes in a child’s life that the court may not want to initiate. For example, if a custody modification is awarded, will the child have to move residences? Change schools? Leave behind friends or access to close family members? Remember, in general, the question at the forefront of any analysis is “what is best for the child?”

    Second, asking for a change in parenting time as opposed to custody is much less likely to begin a contentious situation between you and the custodial parent. A custodial parent may be much less likely to litigate an issue of increased parenting time and may even agree to such a modification. However, if you are truly requesting to modify custody, you are asking a court to reduce the other parent’s custodial rights, and more often than not, the matter will have to be heard by the court at a hearing which will likely result in contention between the parties and additional expense in legal fees and time.

    Dixon & Moseley, P.C. advocates handle modification cases in family law matters throughout the state. We hope this blog post helps you consider your options if your goal is to seek more time with your children or if you are a custodial parent who anticipates a parenting time or custody modification challenge from your child’s other parent. This blog is written for general informational purposes and is not intended as legal advice or a solicitation for services. It is an advertisement.

  • Holidays are also typically divided. See Ind. Parenting Time Guidelines, § II, Part D.
  • This can deviate greatly and is just used to illustrate these concepts.
  • Ind. Code § 31-14-14-2.
  • Ind. Code §§ 31-14-13-6, 13-14-13-2.
  •  

    How Many Days Do You Have to Appeal in Indiana? (2026)

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jul 15, 2026 | Firm News

    An Indiana appellate lawyer’s guide to Notice of Appeal deadlines, Motions to Correct Error, interlocutory appeals, and common timing mistakes. Quick Answer: How Many Days Do You Have to Appeal a Case in Indiana? In most Indiana appeals from a final judgment, the...

    How to Appeal a Case in Indiana: Step-by-Step Guide, Deadlines, Costs, and Common Mistakes (2026)

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jul 9, 2026 | Uncategorized

    A practical Indiana appellate lawyer’s guide to Notice of Appeal deadlines, appealable orders, the appellate record, briefing, oral argument, rehearing, and transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court. If you lost a civil case in Indiana, you may wonder whether the trial...

    Common Grounds for Appeal in Indiana Civil Cases (Complete Guide)

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jul 1, 2026 | Uncategorized

    When a civil case does not go your way in an Indiana trial court, an appeal may provide a path to reversal, but only if certain legal errors occurred. Indiana appellate courts do not retry cases or reweigh evidence. Instead, they review whether the trial court...

    When Is Parental Consent NOT Required for Adoption in Indiana? (2026 Guide)

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jun 25, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Adoption in Indiana typically requires the consent of a child’s biological parents. However, Indiana law provides several important exceptions where a court may allow an adoption to proceed without a parent’s consent. Understanding these exceptions is critical;...

    Failure to Object: When Is an Issue Waived?

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jun 9, 2026 | Uncategorized

    An Indiana Litigation Guide for Preserving Error on Appeal In Indiana litigation, one of the most common mistakes a trial lawyer can make is failing to object at the right time and in the right manner. The rule is simple but unforgiving: if you do not properly object, you may waive the issue for appeal. An objection must be timely…

    Waiver on Appeal: The #1 Reason Appeals Lose in Indiana

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Jun 2, 2026 | Uncategorized

    In Indiana appellate practice, many appeals do not fail because the underlying issue lacked merit. They fail because the issue was waived. In plain terms, waiver means the appellate court will not decide an argument because it was not properly preserved in the trial court, properly supported on appeal, or properly presented under the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure. Common…

    How to Preserve Error for Appeal in Indiana

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | May 28, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary There are several things that an attorney can do to ensure that an error is preserved for appeal. Making timely and specific objections and obtaining an explicit ruling from the judge on such objections can ensure that a matter is preserved. If evidence is excluded, the attorney should make offers of proof through questioning the witness outside of…

    Can a mother legally deny parenting time to an unmarried father?

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | May 10, 2026 | Uncategorized

    The answer depends on several important legal factors, including paternity, custody orders, and the best interests of the child. An unmarried mother has sole legal custody in Indiana unless a court orders otherwise. An unmarried father does not have enforceable rights until paternity is established by either signing a paternity affidavit or filing a paternity action in court. If paternity…

    What Happens to the House in an Indiana Divorce?

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 23, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary A house is considered marital property if it is owned by one or both spouses, even if it was acquired before the marriage. Indiana law presumes that a 50/50 division of marital property is fair, but this presumption can be rebutted by a number of factors. As for the house specifically, the court may award the house to…

    How Indiana Courts Divide Retirement Accounts in Divorce

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 21, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Retirement accounts are generally considered marital property to the extent that were earned during marriage. Although retirement funds that accumulated before the marriage are not automatically excluded from the marital property, they can affect how the marital property is divided. 401(k)s and employer-sponsored retirement plans are divided using a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), which is a court order directing…

    « Older Entries

    Recent Posts

    • How Many Days Do You Have to Appeal in Indiana? (2026)
    • How to Appeal a Case in Indiana: Step-by-Step Guide, Deadlines, Costs, and Common Mistakes (2026)
    • Common Grounds for Appeal in Indiana Civil Cases (Complete Guide)
    • When Is Parental Consent NOT Required for Adoption in Indiana? (2026 Guide)
    • Failure to Object: When Is an Issue Waived?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Dixon & Moseley | Attorneys At Law

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    317-350-4108

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online