Call For A Consultation: 317-350-4108

  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Appellate Practice
    • General Practice
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online
  • Home
  • About
    • Julie C. Dixon
    • Alexander Moseley
    • Matthew McConnell
    • Adrian DeNeen
  • Practice Areas
    • Family Law
      • Adoption
      • Child Custody
      • Child Support/College Expenses
      • Defense Of Protective Orders
      • Divorce Litigation
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianships
      • High-Asset Divorces
      • Legal Separation
      • Paternity
      • Pre- And Post-Nuptials
      • Protective Orders
      • Relocation
    • Criminal Law
      • Indiana Criminal Appeals Lawyer
      • Indiana DUI Lawyer
      • Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Indianapolis Drug Crime Attorney
    • Appellate Practice
      • Petition For Rehearing
      • Interlocutory Appeals
      • Divorce Appeals
      • Child Custody Appeals
      • Civil Appeals
      • Petition For Rehearing
    • General Practice
      • Business Law
      • Indiana Civil Litigation Attorney
      • Indiana Civil Statutes Of Limitations
    • Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Pay Online

 317-350-4108

The Attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C.

Strong, Trial-Ready Advocates Protecting Your Rights

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Child Custody
  4.  | 
  5. How To Obtain Physical And Legal Custody Of An Infant/Toddler You Are Raising

How To Obtain Physical And Legal Custody Of An Infant/Toddler You Are Raising

On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Sep 28, 2020 | Child Custody, De Facto Custodian, Family Law

There are several studies and statistical data compilations indicating a growing number of children in the United States are being raised by third parties. These third parties range from grandparents to relatives or sometimes just a friend of a custodial parent. This person may become a “de facto custodian” and seek physical custody. To do so, he or she must establish evidence they have had the infant or toddler and been their primary caregiver and means of financial support for at least six (6) months in cases where the child is less than three years of age.1 This blog addresses how a third party raising an infant or toddler not their own may become a de facto custodian and other key legal considerations relating to de facto custody.

Assuming you believe you can gather the evidence to establish yourself as a de facto custodian, the question is how to litigate the matter. What court do you file your request in to be adjudicated a de facto custodian and obtain physical custody? Ordinarily, if there has been a divorce or paternity case pending or decided from the past, the de facto custodian would move to intervene in that case to have the de facto status determined and his or her request for custody heard. In cases where the parents were never married or paternity has not been established, the de facto custodian has to bring a miscellaneous action suing the parents for custody. If upon receipt of the evidence, the court determines that the third is a de facto custodian, the court then makes the de facto custodian a party to the proceedings and has a custody hearing. That said, a parent has a fundamental right to raise his or her children over any other person.2 For this reason, the third party must prove they are a de facto custodian by clear and convincing evidence.3

This raises the obvious question of how a third party proves by clear and convincing evidence he or she is a de facto custodian. Because infants and toddlers may not be verbal and/or able to be conversational and process and convey complex thoughts, a person seeking to be determined to be a de facto custodian is unable to have a guardian ad litem interview the child or request the child to be interviewed in chambers by the judge to relay who has been their primary caregiver, namely the de facto custodian. For this reason, a bonding assessment may be required. A bonding assessment is an evaluation conducted by a child psychologist to determine the nature and quality of the bond between and infant/toddler and the third party. This expert would then be called at trial to testify about the close bond the child has to the third party and if it is akin to a bond a child would have with his/her parents, which is at least some evidence to support the duration of care by the third party (an infant or toddler who had not spent much time with the third party would not have a parent-child like bond observed by the child psychologist). In addition, a third party may have to provide witnesses, pictures, receipts, medical records and related types of evidence to establish they were the child’s primary caregiver for the requisite time period.

So after a court finds a party to be a de facto custodian, how then does the court determine who should have custody in the child’s best interests? When a case proceeds to this point, the court considers the best interests factors set forth in the custody statues contained in the Divorce and Paternity Act for making a custody determination in a child’s best interest between biological parents. Under these statutes, the court considers all relevant factors, including the following: (1) the age and sex of the child. (2) the wishes of the child’s parents. (3) the wishes of the child, with more consideration given to the child’s wishes if the child is at least fourteen (14) years of age. (4) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with: (A) the child’s parents; (B) the child’s siblings; and (C) any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest. (5) The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community. (6) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved. (7) Evidence of a pattern of domestic or family violence by either parent.4

In addition in a separate statute covering de facto custodians specifically, the court also considers the following factors in determining custody in de facto cases: (1) The wishes of the child’s de facto custodian.(2) The extent to which the child has been cared for, nurtured, and supported by the de facto custodian. (3) The intent of the child’s parent in placing the child with the de facto custodian. (4) The circumstances under which the child was allowed to remain in the custody of the de facto custodian, including whether the child was placed with the de facto custodian to allow the parent now seeking custody to: (A) seek employment; (B) work; or (C) attend school.5

This is the case and evidence the court receives in a properly prepared and tried de facto custodian case. The court, considering all of the evidence, and some defenses for the parents against losing a child to a de facto custodian, such as to attend school to better him or herself, then awards custody of the child to the child’s de facto custodian if the court determines that it is in the best interests of the child. If the court awards custody of the child to the child’s de facto custodian, the de facto custodian is considered to have legal custody of the child under Indiana law. However, the child’s parents may well be awarded parenting time and have to pay the de facto custodian weekly child support.

Ultimately, with skilled legal counsel, and careful development of the evidence, a third party may be awarded sole physical and legal custody over biological parents. This statutory scheme, augment by caselaw, balances a parent’s fundamental right to raise his or her child against a child’s best interests. Is this your case? If so, you should seek counsel familiar with and who has tried de facto custody cases. This blog is written by attorneys at Dixon & Moseley, P.C. to provide general information about how a third party raising an infant or toddler may obtain custody as a de facto custodian. It is not intended as legal advice or a solicitation for services. It is an advertisement.

  • Indiana Code 31-9-2-35.5 (definition of a de facto custodian).
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).
  • This is higher burden of proof than preponderance of the evidence but not as high as a criminal burden of proof where the state has to prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Indiana Code section 31-14-3-2 (there are mirror statutes in the paternity and divorce codes).
  • Indiana Code section 31-14-13-2.5 (there are mirror statutes in the paternity and divorce codes).
  • What Counts as Marital Property in Indiana?

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 19, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary Indiana is a “one-pot” property state when it comes to marital property. This means that almost all property owned by either spouse at the time of the dissolution is included. Common types of marital property include property acquired during the marriage, property owned before the marriage, inheritances and gifts, retirement accounts and pensions, businesses, and debts and liabilities.…

    Parenting Time vs. Custody in Indiana: What Parents Confuse Most

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 15, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary There are many differences and common misconceptions surrounding custody and parenting time. Custody, which is divided into legal custody and physical custody, deals with who has the authority to make major decisions about a child’s life and where the child primarily lives, respectively. Parenting time refers to the schedule of when each parent will physically spend time with…

    Can Custody Be Modified in Indiana? What Must Change

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 9, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary Yes, custody can be modified in Indiana. Courts require a showing that modification of custody is in the best interests of the child and that there has been a substantial change in one or more statutory factors the court looks at when deciding custody. Some common examples of changes that warrant custody modification include a significant change in…

    How Indiana Judges Decide Child Custody—the “Best Interests of the Child” Standard

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 7, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary When parents separate or divorce, child custody is often the most emotional and contested issue. In Indiana, judges do not award custody based on gender, income alone, or who “deserves” it more. Instead, courts apply a legal standard known as the “best interests of the child.” Courts consider 8 statutory factors to determine what custody arrangement is in…

    Is Indiana a 50/50 Divorce State? What the Law Really Says

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 5, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary The short answer is no, Indiana is not a 50/50 divorce state, but it often starts out that way. Indiana does not require marital property to be divided equally in every divorce. Instead, Indiana follows the rule of equitable distribution, with a presumption that an equal division is fair unless evidence shows otherwise. The court looks at the…

    Step-Parent Adoption: How It Works in Indiana

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Apr 5, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Stepparent adoption grants the same legal rights and responsibilities to a stepparent that a biological parent would have. In addition to meeting the requirements associated with any form of adoption, the stepparent must be leally married to the custodial parent to adopt their stepchild. The non-custodial biological parent of the child must consent to the adoption absent specific legal grounds…

    How Divorce Works in Indiana: Step by Step (2026 Guide)

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Mar 24, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary In order to divorce in Indiana, at least one spouse must meet the statutory residency requirement. There are numerous grounds recognized for divorce by Indiana courts, but the most common is irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. A spouse seeking a divorce must prepare a petition including information about any minor or dependent children they have, as well as…

    Indiana Guardianship Laws (2026): How to File, Costs, Types, and Alternatives

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Mar 19, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Executive Summary A guardianship is a court supervised legal arrangement where a judge appoints a guardian to make decisions for someone that is incapacitated and unable to make decisions about their finances. To obtain a guardianship, a prospective guardian must file a petition for guardianship with the appropriate court, notify interested parties, and attend a hearing where a judge will…

    Indiana’s New Custody Law: What Parents Need to Know About Findings of Fact Executive Summary

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Mar 17, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Indiana law now requires judges to explain child custody decisions in writing. As of July 1, 2025, Indiana courts must include written findings of fact and conclusions of law in final custody orders. This means judges can no longer issue unexplained custody rulings. Instead, they must clearly identify the evidence they relied upon and explain how it supports the custody…

    Protective Order in Indiana: Filing Online, What It Covers, and What Happens Next Executive Summary

    On Behalf of Dixon & Moseley, P.C. | Mar 12, 2026 | Uncategorized

    Indiana protective orders are civil court orders that can restrict contact, require someone to stay away from you, and impose other safety‑related conditions in situations involving domestic or family violence, sexual assault, stalking, harassment, or child sex grooming. In Indiana, petitions for protective orders can be filed through the state’s Protection Order E‑Filing Service, and once an order is issued,…

    « Older Entries
    Next Entries »

    Recent Posts

    • How Many Days Do You Have to Appeal in Indiana? (2026)
    • How to Appeal a Case in Indiana: Step-by-Step Guide, Deadlines, Costs, and Common Mistakes (2026)
    • Common Grounds for Appeal in Indiana Civil Cases (Complete Guide)
    • When Is Parental Consent NOT Required for Adoption in Indiana? (2026 Guide)
    • Failure to Object: When Is an Issue Waived?

    Archives

    Categories

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

    Reach Out Now For A Confidential Consultation

    Office Address

    50 East 91st Street
    Suite 200
    Indianapolis, IN 46240

      Indianapolis Law Office

    Phone Number

    317-350-4108

    • Follow
    • Follow

    © 2026 Dixon & Moseley, P.C. • All Rights Reserved

    Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

    Review Us
    Pay Online